IELTS Writing Task 2 – Band 8.0 Sample

Some people argue that imposing longer prison sentences is the most effective way to tackle crime. Although harsh punishment may have a role to play for serious offenders, I strongly disagree that it is the best solution.

Admittedly, longer sentences offer some advantages. Dangerous criminals who are kept behind bars are unable to reoffend, and the threat of a lengthy sentence may act as a deterrent for some potential offenders. Moreover, victims and their families often feel that justice has been done when punishment is severe.

However, the evidence suggests that longer sentences do little to reduce crime overall. Many crimes are committed on impulse or under the influence of drugs, so offenders rarely weigh up the consequences beforehand. In addition, prisons can become breeding grounds for further criminal behaviour, as inmates mix with more experienced criminals and lose contact with their families and jobs. As a result, many former prisoners find it difficult to reintegrate into society and end up returning to crime.

In my view, crime is better addressed by tackling its root causes. Investment in education, youth programmes and job training can steer young people away from crime in the first place. Likewise, rehabilitation schemes that teach prisoners practical skills have been shown to reduce reoffending rates in many countries. Such programmes are also considerably cheaper than keeping people in prison for many years.

In conclusion, while lengthy sentences may be justified for the most violent criminals, they are not the best way to reduce crime. Prevention and rehabilitation offer a far more lasting solution, benefiting both offenders and society.