IELTS Writing Task 2 – Band 8.0 Sample

There is ongoing debate about whether art and music should be compulsory for every secondary school student. I agree to a large extent, provided that these subjects are taught flexibly and do not take time away from core subjects.

The strongest argument for making them compulsory is that they develop creativity, a skill that is increasingly valued in the modern economy. Drawing, composing or playing an instrument teaches students to experiment with ideas, solve problems in original ways and persist despite failure. Many designers, engineers and entrepreneurs credit their early artistic training with helping them think outside the box. Such qualities are useful in almost every career.

In addition, art and music bring important emotional and social benefits. For teenagers under intense academic pressure, these lessons offer a way to relieve stress and express feelings that they cannot put into words. Group activities such as choirs or school bands also teach teamwork and discipline. Furthermore, if these subjects were optional, students from poorer families, who cannot afford private lessons, might never have the chance to discover their talents.

On the other hand, it is true that not every student enjoys or excels at the arts, and forcing them to sit through lessons they dislike may be counterproductive. This problem can be solved by offering a wide range of options, such as photography, drama or digital design, so that each student can find an area of interest. A student who struggles to draw, for instance, might thrive in a film-making or music technology class.

In conclusion, I believe art and music should be compulsory at secondary level because they nurture creativity and wellbeing, as long as schools give students genuine choice within these subjects.